Pharmacogenomics & Pharmacogenetics
This page is a compilation of the following related articles:
Definitions:
Pharmacogenetics examines the single gene interactions with drugs.
Pharmacogenomics examines the whole genome application of pharmacogenetics and not only the single gene.
Note: sometimes the terms pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics tend to be used interchangeably.
Pharmacogenomics
Pharmacogenomics is the branch of pharmacology which deals with the influence of genetic variation on drug response in patients by correlating gene expression or single-nucleotide polymorphisms with a drug's efficacy or toxicity. By doing so, pharmacogenomics aims to develop rational means to optimise drug therapy, with respect to the patients' genotype, to ensure maximum efficacy with minimal adverse effects. Such approaches promise the advent of "personalized medicine", in which drugs and drug combinations are optimised for each individual's unique genetic makeup.
Pharmacogenomics is the whole genome application of pharmacogenetics, which examines the single gene interactions with drugs.
See also
External links
Pharmacogenetics
The terms pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics
tend to be used interchangeably, and a precise, consensus definition of
either remains elusive. Pharmacogenetics is generally regarded as the
study or clinical testing of genetic variation that gives rise to differing response to drugs, while pharmacogenomics is the broader application of genomic technologies to new drug discovery and further characterization of older drugs. Pharmacogenetics considers one or at most a few genes of interest, while pharmacogenomics considers the entire genome.
Pharmacogenetics and adverse drug reactions
Much of current clinical interest is at the level of pharmacogenetics, involving variation in genes involved in, drug metabolism
with a particular emphasis on improving drug safety. The wider use of
pharmacogenetic testing is viewed by many as an outstanding opportunity
to improve prescribing safety and efficacy. Driving this trend are the
106,000 deaths and 2.2 Million serious events caused by adverse drug
reactions in the US each year (Lazarou 1998). As such ADRs are
responsible for 5-7% of hospital admissions in the US and Europe, lead
to the withdrawal of 4% of new medicines and cost society an amount
equal to the costs of drug treatment (Ingelman-Sundberg 2005).
Comparisons of the list of drugs most commonly implicated in adverse
drug reactions with the list of metabolizing enzymes with known polymorphisms
found that drugs commonly involved in adverse drug reactions were also
those that were metabolized by enzymes with known polymorphisms (see
Phillips, 2001).
History
The first observations of genetic variation in drug response date from the 1950s, involving the muscle relaxant suxamethonium chloride, and drugs metabolized by N-acetyltransferase. One in 3500 Caucasians has less efficient variant of the enzyme (butyrylcholinesterase) that metabolizes suxamethonium chloride. As a consequence, the drug’s effect is prolonged, with slower recovery from surgical paralysis. Variation in the N-acetyltransferase gene divides people into “slow acetylators” and “fast acetylators”, with very different half-lives and blood concentrations of such important drugs as isoniazid (antituberculosis) and procainamide (antiarrhythmic).
Azathioprine, methotrexate and TPMT (thiopurine methyl transferase)
One of the earliest tests for a genetic variation resulting in a clinically important consequence was on the enzyme thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT). TPMT metabolizes 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine, two drugs used in a range of indications, from childhood leukemia to autoimmune diseases. In people with a deficiency in TPMT, metabolism must proceed by other pathways, one of which leads to a metabolite that is toxic to the bone marrow; these people are at risk of a potentially fatal bone marrow suppression. In 85-90% of affected people, this deficiency results from one of three variant alleles.
One in 300 people have two variant alleles; these people need only
6-10% of the standard dose of the drug, and, if treated with the full
dose, will develop severe bone marrow suppression. For them, genotype predicts clinical outcome, a prerequisite for an effective pharmacogenetic test. Around 10% of people are heterozygous
and produce a reduced quantity of functional enzyme. Overall, they are
at greater risk of adverse effects, although as individuals their
genotype is not necessarily predictive of their clinical outcome, which
makes the interpretation of a clinical test difficult. Recent research
suggests that children who are heterozygous may have a better response to treatment, which raises whether people who have two wild-type alleles could tolerate a higher therapeutic dose. The US Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) have recently deliberated the inclusion of a recommendation for
testing for TPMT deficiency to the prescribing information for 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine.
Hitherto the information has carried the warning that inherited
deficiency of the enzyme could increase the risk of severe bone marrow
suppression. Now it will carry the recommendation that people who
develop bone marrow suppression while receiving 6-mercaptopurine or
azathioprine be tested for TPMT deficiency. Variation in TPMT affects a
small proportion of people, though seriously. As part of the inborn
system for clearing the body of xenobiotics, the cytochrome P450 oxidases (CYP450) are heavily involved in drug metabolism, and variations in CYP450s affect large populations. One member of the CYP450 superfamily, CYP2D6,
now has over 75 known allelic variations, some of which lead to no
activity, and some to enhanced activity. An estimated 29% of people in
parts of East Africa
may have multiple copies of the gene, and will therefore not be
adequately treated with standard doses of drugs such as the painkiller codeine (which is activated by the enzyme).
References
- Abbott A. With your genes? Take one of these, three times a day. Nature 2003;425:760-762.
- Evans WE and McLeod HL. Pharmacogenomics – Drug Disposition, Drug Targets, and Side Effects. New Engl J Med 2003;348:358-349.
- Ingelman-Sundberg M, Rodrquez-Antona C, Pharmacogenetics of
drug-maetabolizing enzymes: implications for a safer and more effective
drug therapy. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:1563-1570 2005
- Lazarou, J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN, Incidence of Adverse Drug
Reactions in Hospitalized Patients: A meta-analysis of prospective
studies. JAMA 1998;279:1200-1205
- Phillips KA, Veenstra DL, Oren E, Lee JK, Sadee W. Potential role
of pharmacogenomics in reducing adverse drug reactions: a systematic
review. JAMA 2001;286:2270-2279.
- Weinshilboum R. Inheritance and Drug Response. New Engl J Med 2003; 348:529-537.
See also
External links
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia Encyclopedia article "Pharmacogenomics"
|