Experiments
Mobile Phones and Driving Safety
This Manhattan driver is juggling two phones at once
Mobile phone use while driving is common but controversial. Using a
cellular telephone while operating a motor vehicle has been shown to
increase the risk of accident. Because of this, many governments have
made the use of a cell phone while driving illegal.
Increased risk
The American National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) says that the inattention and distraction created by the use of
a cellular telephone while driving is similar to that associated with
other distractions in increasing crash risk. However, the data are
insufficient to indicate the magnitude of the safety problem.[1]
Case-crossover studies
A 1997 Canadian study [2] and a 2005 Australian study [3]
both estimated the risk of a collision when using a cellular telephone
was four times higher than the risk when a cellular telephone was not
being used. 699 and 456 drivers, respectively, who owned phones, were
involved in crashes, and volunteered for the studies were examined. By
collecting volunteers' cell phone records, scientists were able to
determine who placed telephone calls shortly before the time of crash,
and through case-crossover analysis (a technique often used in medical
studies of heart-attacks and air pollution) of cell phone habits, calculated the increase in risk. Both studies found that hands-free devices were not considerably safer.
A more traditional study method was used by the Société de l'assurance automobile du Québec
(SAAQ) for their 2003 study. Questionnaires were sent to 175,000
drivers and analysis was done on the 36,078 who responded. The
questionnaire asked about driving habits, risk exposure, collisions
over the past 24 months, socio-demographic information, and cell phone
use. Questionnaires were supported with data from cell phone companies
and police crash records. The study found that the overall relative risk
(RR) of having an accident for cell phone users when compared to
non-cell phone users averaged 1.38 across all groups. When adjusted for
kilometers driven per year and other crash risk exposures, RR was 1.11
for men and 1.21 for women. They also found that increased cell phone
use correlated with an increase in RR. When the same data were
reanalyzed using a Bayesian
approach, the calculated RR of 0.78 for those making less than 1
call/day and 2.27 for those with more than 7 calls/day was similar to
cohort analysis. When the data were reanalyzed using case-crossover
analysis, RR was calculated at a much higher 5.13. The authors
expressed concern that misclassification of phone calls due to
reporting errors of the exact time of the collisions was a major source
of bias with all case-crossover analysis of this issue. [4][5][6]
Simulation studies
Means and standard errors (in parentheses) for the Alcohol, Baseline, and Cell-Phone conditions
|
Alcohol |
Baseline |
Cell Phone |
| Total Accidents |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| Brake Onset Time (msec) |
888 (51) |
943 (58) |
1022 (61) |
| Braking Force (% of maximum) |
69.6 (3.6) |
56.4 (2.5) |
55.2 (2.9) |
| Speed (MPH) |
52.8 (.08) |
54.9 (.08) |
53.2 (.07) |
| Following Distance (meters) |
26.5 (1.7) |
27.3 (1.3) |
28.5 (1.6) |
| ½ Recovery Time |
5.4 (0.3) |
5.4 (0.3) |
6.2 (0.4) |
Simulations are particularly useful for comparing cell phone use
while driving with the known-dangerous drunk driving. A 2003 study by University of Utah Psychology
professor David Strayer measured response time, following distance, and
driving speed of a control group, subjects at the legal BAC limit of 0.08%, and subjects involved in cell phone conversations. Data from the report are listed to the right.
From the report:
Drivers in the cell-phone condition exhibited a sluggish behavior
(i.e., slower reactions) which they attempted to compensate for by
increasing their following distance. Drivers in the alcohol condition
exhibited a more aggressive driving style, in which they followed
closer, necessitating braking with greater force.
After controlling for driving difficulty and time on task, the study
concluded that cell phone drivers exhibited greater impairment than
intoxicated drivers. [7]
A 2005 review by the Hawaiian legislature entitled "Cell Phone Use and Motor Vehicle Collisions: A Review of the Studies"[8] contains an analysis of the current state of knowledge on cell phone/motor vehicle accident causality.
Meta-analysis by The Canadian Automobile Association[9] and The University of Illinois[10] found that response time while using both hands-free and hand-held phones was approximately 0.5 standard deviations
higher than normal driving (i.e., an average driver, while talking on a
cell phone, has response times of a driver in roughly the 40th
percentile).
As a percentage of distraction-related accidents
Driver inattention is estimated to be a factor in between 20 to 50
percent of all police-reported crashes. Driver distraction, a
sub-category of inattention, has been estimated to be a contributing
factor in 8 to 13 percent of all crashes. Of distraction-related
accidents, cell phone use may range from 1.5 to 5 percent of
contributing factors.[11]
However, large percentages of unknowns in each of those categories may
cause inaccuracies in these estimations. A 2001 study sponsored by The American Automobile Association
recorded "Unknown Driver Attention Status" for 41.5 percent of crashes,
and "Unknown Distraction" in 8.6 percent of all distraction related
accidents.[12]
According to NHTSA, "There is clearly inadequate reporting of crashes
that may be related to cellular telephone use while driving".[1]
Currently, "Outside person, object, event" (rubbernecking)
is the most reported cause of distraction-related accidents, followed
by "Adjusting radio/cassette/CD". "Using/dialing cell phone" is eighth.
Driving while using a hands-free device is not safer than while
using a hand held cell phone, as concluded by case-crossover studies.[2][3] epidemiological,[4][5] simulation,[7] and meta-analysis[9][10]. The increased "cognitive workload" involved in holding a conversation, not the use of hands, causes the increased risk.[13][14][15] One notable exception to that conclusion is a study by headset manufacturer Plantronics,
which found 71 percent of the test subjects steered more accurately,
100 percent had faster brake reaction times, and 92 percent maintained
a more consistent speed when using a headset versus handheld.[16]
The consistency of increased crash risk between hands-free and hand
held cell phone use is at odds with legislation in many locations that
prohibits hand held cell phone use but allows hands-free. Dialing a
cell phone is more distracting than talking on a cell phone, [17] and hands-free devices that offer voice-dialing may reduce or eliminate that increased risk.
As compared to conversation with a passenger
The scientific literature is mixed on the dangers of talking on a
cell phone versus those of talking with a passenger. The common
conception is that passengers are able to better regulate conversation
based on the perceived level of danger, therefore the risk is
negligible. The Accident Research Unit at the University of Nottingham
found that the number of utterances was usually higher for mobile calls
when compared to blindfolded and non-blindfolded passengers across
various driving conditions. The number of questions asked averaged
slightly higher for mobile phone conversations, although results were
not constant across road types and largely influenced by a large number
of questions on the urban roads.[18] A 2004 University of Utah
simulation study that compared passenger and cell-phone conversations
concluded that the driver performs better when conversing with a
passenger because the traffic and driving task become part of the
conversation. Drivers holding conversations on cell phones were four
times more likely to miss the highway exit than those with passengers,
and drivers conversing with passengers showed no statistically
significant difference from lone drivers in the simulator.[19] A study led by Andrew Parkes at the Transport Research Laboratory,
also with a driving simulator, concluded that hands-free phone
conversations impair driving performance more than other common
in-vehicle distractions such as passenger conversations.[20]
In contrast, the University of Illinois meta-analysis concluded that passenger conversations were just as costly to driving performance as cell phone ones.[10]
AAA ranks passengers as the third most reported cause of
distraction-related accidents at 11 percent, compared to 1.5 percent
for cellular telephones.[12] A simulation study funded by the American Transportation Research Board
concluded that driving events that require urgent responses may be
influenced by in-vehicle conversations, and that there is little
practical evidence that passengers adjusted their conversations to
changes in the traffic. It concluded that drivers' training should
address the hazards of both mobile phone and passenger conversations.[21]
Texting
The scientific literature on the dangers of driving while sending a
text message from a mobile phone, or driving while texting, is limited.
A simulation study at the Monash University
Accident Research Center provided strong evidence that retrieving and,
in particular, sending text messaged has a detrimental effect on a
number of safety critical driving measures. Specifically, negative
effects were seen in detecting and responding correctly to road signs,
detecting hazards, time spend with eyes off the road, and (only for
sending text messages) lateral position. Surprisingly, mean speed,
speed variability, lateral position when receiving text messages, and
following distance showed no difference. [22]
A separate, yet unreleased simulation study at the University of Utah
found a sixfold increase in distraction-related accidents when texting.[23]
The lack of scientific studies may be indicative of a general
assumption that if talking on a mobile phone increases risk, then
texting also increases risk, and probably more so. 89% of U.S. adults
think that text messaging while driving is "distracting, dangerous and
should be outlawed."[24]
This has been supported by legislatures, and most countries and states
that ban hand-held cell phones while driving also ban texting while
driving.
Legislation
Accidents involving a driver being distracted by talking on a mobile
phone have begun to be prosecuted as negligence similar to driving
while intoxicated. In the United Kingdom, from 27 February 2007,
motorists who are caught using a hand-held mobile phone while driving
will have three penalty points added to their license in addition to
the fine of £60.[25] This increase was introduced to try to stem the increase in drivers ignoring the law.[26] Japan, Portugal and Singapore prohibit all mobile phone use while driving, including hands-free.
Effectiveness of legislation
Current laws banning cell phone use in New York and Connecticut have
proven to be ineffective, due to a lack of visible enforcement. The
percentage of offenders decreased from 2.3% to 1.1% immediately after
the ban was implemented, but after being in effect for a year the
percentage increased to 2.1%, which is not significantly different from
the pre-ban figure. The authors of the study conclude that "vigorous
enforcement campaigns accompanied by publicity appear necessary to
achieve longer term compliance."[27]
List of countries with bans
Countries where using a hand-held phone while driving is illegal:[28][29]
References
- ^ a b An Investigation of the Safety Implications of Wireless Communications in Vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1997).
- ^ a b Redelmeier, Donald (February 13, 1997). "ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CELLULAR-TELEPHONE CALLS AND MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISIONS". The New England Journal of Medicine 336 (7): 453-458.
- ^ a b McEvoy, Suzanne (2005), Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study, <http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/bmj.38537.397512.55v1>
- ^ a b Laberge-Nadeau, Claire (September 2003). "Wireless telephones and the risk of road crashes". Accident Analysis & Prevention 35 (5): 649-660.
- ^ a b Claire Laberge-Nadeau (October 2-5, 2005). "Linking data from different sources to estimate the risk of a collision when using a cell phone while driving".
- ^ Claire Laberge-Nadeau et al. (2006). "Crash Risk and Cell Phone Use: Important Questions on the Real Risk for Legal Decision Makers" (PDF).
- ^ a b Strayer, David; Drews, Frank & Crouch, Dennis (2003), FATAL DISTRACTION? A COMPARISON OF THE CELL-PHONE DRIVER AND THE DRUNK DRIVER, University of Utah Department of Psychology, <http://www.psych.utah.edu/AppliedCognitionLab/DrivingAssessment2003.pdf>
- ^ Cell Phone Use and Motor Vehicle Collisions: A Review of the Studies
- ^ a b Jeffrey K. Caird et al. (October 25, 2004). "EFFECTS OF CELLULAR TELEPHONES ON DRIVING BEHAVIOUR AND CRASH RISK: RESULTS OF META-ANALYSIS" (PDF). CAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
- ^ a b c Horrey, William; Christopher Wickens (Spring 2006). "Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques". Human Factors 38 (1): 196-205. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
- ^ Eby, David; Lidia Kostyniuk (May 2003). "Driver distraction and crashes: An assessment of crash databases and review of the literature". {{{booktitle}}}.
- ^ a b Jane C. Stutts, et al. (May 2001). "THE ROLE OF DRIVER DISTRACTION IN TRAFFIC CRASHES" (PDF). AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
- ^ Recarte
M. A. & Nunes L. M. (2003). "Mental Workload While Driving: Effects
on Visual Search, Discrimination, and Decision Making.". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2 (9): 119-137.
- ^ Strayer
D. L., Drews F. A. & Johnston W. A. (2003). "Cell Phone-Induced
Failures of Visual Attention During Simulated Driving.". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1 (9): 23-32.
- ^ Strayer
D. L. & William J. A. (2001). "Driven to distraction: Dual-Task
Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone.". Psychological Science 6 (12): 462-466.
- ^ "Hands-Free Phones Safer, Study Finds", Consumer Affairs.com, 4 August, 2004.
- ^ Kolko, Jed (17 July 2007). "Dialing While Fishtailing: How Mobile Phones, Hands-Free Laws, and Driving Conditions Interact to Affect Traffic Fatalities" (pdf). Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
- ^ David Crundall, Manpreet Bains, Peter Chapman, Geoffrey Underwood (2005). "Regulating conversation during driving: a problem for mobile telephones?". Transportation Research, Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8F (3): 197-211.
- ^ drews, Frank; Monisha Pasupathi and David L. Strayer (2004). "PASSENGER AND CELL-PHONE CONVERSATIONS IN SIMULATED DRIVING". {{{booktitle}}}, PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 48th ANNUAL MEETING.
- ^ Conversations in cars: the relative hazards of mobile phones
- ^ Laberge, Jason (2004), EFFECTS OF PASSENGER AND CELLULAR PHONE CONVERSATIONS ON DRIVER DISTRACTION, Transportation Research Board, <http://pubsindex.trb.org/document/view/default.asp?lbid=749679>
- ^ Hosking, Simon; Kristie Young, Michael Regan. "The Effects of Text Messaging on Young Novice Driver Performance". {{{booktitle}}}.
- ^ Text messaging not illegal but data clear on its peril
- ^ 89% of Americans Want Texting While Driving Outlawed
- ^ Drivers face new phone penalties
- ^ Careless talk
- ^ A T McCartt and L L Geary (2004). "Longer term effects of New York State’s law on drivers’ hand-held cell phone use.". Injury Prevention 10: 11-15.
- ^ Countries that ban cell phones while driving, from Cellular-News.com
- ^ Don't drive and use your cell phone here, from About.com
- ^ Guide to Driving in Croatia Economy Car Hire.com
- ^ Jail for mobile phone use in cars Daily News and Analysis
- ^ Cell Phone Driving Laws by State, from letstalk.com
- ^ State Cell Phone Driving Laws, from the Governors Highway Safety Association
- ^ PART 634-MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC SUPERVISION, § 634.25 Installation traffic codes
External links
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia Encyclopedia article "Mobile Phones and Driving Safety"
|